Jump to content

Health effects from noise

From Wikipedia
Health effects from noise
Subclass ofdeterminants of health, external causes of illness and death Edit
Facet givenoise pollution Edit
Studied byaudiology Edit
More dan a quarter of US residences get average outside noise levels wey dey exceed de maximum nighttime outside noise level wey de World Health Organization recommend am.[1]

Noise health effects be de physical den psychological health consequences of regular exposure to consistent elevated sound levels. De World Health Organization consider noise from traffic, in particular, to be one of de worst environmental stressors give humans, wey dey second only to air pollution.[2] Elevated workplace anaa environmental noise fi cause hearing impairment, tinnitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, annoyance, den sleep disturbance.[3][4] Dem sanso attribute changes for de immune system den birth defects insyd to noise exposure.[5]

Although age-related health effects (presbycusis) dey occur naturally plus age,[6] for many countries insyd de cumulative impact of noise dey sufficient to impair de hearing of a large fraction of de population ova de course of a lifetime.[7][8] Dem know noise exposure to induce noise-induced hearing loss, tinnitus, hypertension, vasoconstriction, den oda cardiovascular adverse effects.[9][4] Dem associate chronic noise exposure plus sleep disturbances den increased incidence of diabetes. Adverse cardiovascular effects dey occur from chronic exposure to noise sekof de sympathetic nervous system ein inability to habituate. De sympathetic nervous system dey maintain lighter stages of sleep wen dem expose de body to noise, wey no dey allow blood pressure to follow de normal rise den fall cycle of an undisturbed circadian rhythm.[3]

Dem link stress from time wey dem spend around elevated noise levels plus increased workplace accident rates, aggression, den oda anti-social behaviors.[10] De most significant sources be vehicles, aircraft, prolonged exposure to loud music, den industrial noise.[11] Dem link prolonged exposure to noise at home to decreased mental health.[12]

Der dey approximately 10,000 deaths per year as a result of noise for de European Union insyd.[13][14]

Noise-induced hearing loss

[edit | edit source]
An audiologist wey dey conduct an audiometric hearing test for a sound-proof testing booth insyd

Noise-induced hearing loss be a permanent shift for pure-tone thresholds insyd, wey dey result for sensorineural hearing loss insyd. De severity of a threshold shift dey dependent for duration den severity of noise exposure top. Dem see noise-induced threshold shifts as a notch for an audiogram top from 3000 to 6000 Hz, but most often at 4000 Hz.[15]

Exposure to loud noises, either for a single traumatic experience insyd anaa ova time, fi damage de auditory system den dey result for hearing loss insyd den sometimes tinnitus as well. Traumatic noise exposure fi happen at work (e.g., loud machinery), at play (e.g., loud sporting events, concerts, recreational activities), den/anaa by accident (e.g., a backfiring engine). Noise-induced hearing loss be sometimes unilateral den typically dey cause patients to lose hearing around de frequency of de triggering sound trauma.[16]

Tinnitus

[edit | edit source]

Tinnitus be an auditory disorder wey de perception of a sound (ringing, chirping, buzzing, etc.) characterize am for de ear insyd for de absence of an external sound source insyd. Der dey two types of tinnitus: subjective den objective. Subjective be de most common den fi hear am only "for de head insyd" by de person wey e affect am. Dem fi hear objective tinnitus from dem around de person wey e affect am den de audiologist fi hear am using a stethoscope. Dem sanso fi categorize tinnitus by de way e dey sound for one ein ear insyd, pulsatile tinnitus[17] wey de vascular nature of Glomus tumors cause am den non-pulsatile tinnitus wey dey usually sound like crickets, de sea den bees.

Though dem no know de pathophysiology of tinnitus, noise exposure fi be a contributing factor; therefore dem fi associate tinnitus plus with hearing loss, wey de cochlea den central nervous system (CNS) generate am. High-frequency hearing loss dey cause a high-pitched tinnitus den low-frequency hearing loss dey cause a roaring tinnitus.[18] Noise-induced tinnitus fi be temporary anaa permanent wey dey depend for de type den amount of noise top wey dem expose a person to.

Cardiovascular effects

[edit | edit source]

Dem already associate noise plus important cardiovascular health problems, particularly hypertension, as e dey cause an increase for levels of stress hormones den vascular oxidative stress insyd.[2][19][20][21] Noise levels of 50 dB(A) anaa greater at night fi increase de risk of myocardial infarction by chronically elevating cortisol production.[22][23][24]

Traffic noise get several negative effects, wey dey include increased risk give coronary artery disease, plus night-time exposure to noise possibly more harmful dan day-time exposure.[2] Dem already sanso show am to increase blood pressure for individuals insyd within de surrounding residential areas, plus railways wey dey cause de greatest cardiovascular effects.[25][26] Roadway noise levels dey sufficient to constrict arterial blood flow den dey lead to elevated blood pressure.[27][25] Vasoconstriction fi result from elevated adrenaline levels anaa thru medical stress reactions. Dem correlate long-term exposure to noise to an increase for cortisol den angiotensin-II levels insyd wey dem respectively associate am plus oxidative stress den vascular inflammation.[2] Individuals wey dey subject to greater dan 80 dB(A) for de workplace insyd dey at increased risk of having increased blood pressure.[28][29]

A 2021 systematic review for de effect of occupational exposure to noise on ischemic heart disease (IHD) top, stroke den hypertension, wey de World Health Organization (WHO) coordinate am den de International Labour Organization (ILO) locate 17 studies dat meet de inclusion criteria, wey dey comprise a total of 534,688 participants (7.47% females) for 11 countries insyd den for three WHO regions insyd (de Americas, Europe, den de Western Pacific).[30] De study find de low quality of evidence de effect of occupational exposure to intense noise (≥85 dBA), wey dem compare am to occupational exposure below 85 dBA (<85 dBA). Dem conclude dat der dey inadequate evidence of harmfulness give de studied outcomes plus de exception of de risk of acquiring IHD, wey dey 29% higher give dem pippoe wey dem expose to noise for demma workplace insyd.[30]

Oda physical health effects

[edit | edit source]

Traffic noise fi sanso increase de risk of sleep disturbances, stroke, diabetes, den becoming overweight.[2] Noise pollution be an environmental health concern since e often be a risk factor give dey develop oda diseases like tinnitus anaa impaired speech discrimination.[31]

Psychological impacts of noise

[edit | edit source]

Dem already discover causal relationships between noise den psychological effects wey dey include annoyance, psychiatric disorders, den effects for psychosocial well-being top.[5] Exposure to intense levels of noise fi cause personality changes den violent reactions.[32] Dem sanso show noise to be a factor wey dem attribute to violent reactions.[33] De psychological impacts of noise sanso dey include an addiction to loud music. Dem research dis for a study insyd where dem find non-professional musicians to get loudness addictions more often dan non-musician control subjects.[34]

Psychological health effects from noise sanso dey include depression den anxiety. Individuals wey get hearing loss, wey dey include noise-induced hearing loss, fi get demma symptoms dem alleviate plus de use of hearing aids. Individuals wey no dey seek treatment give demma loss be 50% more likely to get depression dan demma aided peers.[35] Dem psychological effects fi lead to detriments for physical care insyd for de form of reduced self-care, work-tolerance, den increased isolation insyd.[36]

Auditory stimuli sanso fi serve as psychological triggers give individuals plus post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).[37]

Stress

[edit | edit source]

Research wey Rockwool commission am, a multi-national insulation manufacturer wey dem headquarter am for Denmark insyd, dey reveal dat for de UK insyd, one third (33%) of victims of domestic disturbances dey claim dat loud parties already lef am unable to sleep anaa make dem stressed for de last two years insyd. Around one for eleven insyd (9%)[38] of dem pippoe wey domestic disturbances affect am dey claim it already lef dem continually disturbed den stressed. More dan 1.8 million pippoe dey claim noisy neighbours make demma life a misery den dem no fi enjoy demmar own homes. De impact of noise for health top be potentially a significant problem across de UK wey dem give dat de inhabitants of neighbouring properties for de last two years insyd already disturb more dan 17.5 million Britons (38%). Give almost one for ten insyd (7%) Britons dis be a regular occurrence.[38]

Dem reinforced de extent of de problem of noise pollution give public health by figures wey Rockwool collate am from local authority responses to a Freedom of Information Act (FOI) request. Dis research dey reveal dat for de period April 2008 – 2009 insyd UK councils receive 315,838 complaints about noise pollution from private residences. Dis result for environmental health officers across de UK insyd wey dey serve 8,069 noise abatement notices, anaa citations under de terms of de Anti-Social Behaviour (Scotland) Act.[38]

Westminster City Council[39] already receive more complaints per head of population dan any oda district for de UK insyd plus 9,814 grievances about noise, wey dey equate to 42.32 complaints per thousand residents. Eight of de top 10 councils wey dem rank by complaints per 1,000 residents dey for London insyd.

Annoyance

[edit | edit source]

Dem typically perceive sudden impulse noises as more bothersome dan noise from traffic of equal volume.[40] Demographics minimally affect annoyance effects of noise, but fear of de noise source den sensitivity to noise dey both strongly affect de 'annoyance' of a noise.[41] Sound levels as low as 40 dB(A) fi generate noise complaints[42] den de lower threshold give noise wey dey produce sleep disturbance dey 45 dB(A) anaa lower.[43]

Oda factors dat affect de annoyance level of sound dey include beliefs about noise prevention den de importance of de noise source, den annoyance at de cause (i.e., non-noise-related factors) of de noise.[44] Many of de interpretations of de level of annoyance den de relationship between noise levels den dey result health symptoms fi be influenced by de quality of interpersonal relationships at de workplace, as well as de stress level wey de work einself generate am.[5][45] Evidence give impact for annoyance of long-term noise versus recent changes top dey uncertain.[44]

Approximately 35% to 40% of office workers dey find noise levels from 55 to 60 dB(A) extremely irritating.[5] Dem set de noise standard for Germany insyd give mentally stressful tasks at 55 dB(A),[46] howeva, if de noise source dey continuous, de threshold level give tolerability among office workers dey lower dan 55 dB(A).[5]

Kiddie physical development

[edit | edit source]

De U.S. Environmental Protection Agency author a pamphlet for 1978 insyd dat suggest a correlation between low-birthweight (using de World Health Organization definition of less dan 2,500 grams (88 oz)) den high sound levels, den sanso high rates of birth defects for places insyd wey dem expose expectant mothers to elevated sound levels, wey dey include typical airport environments. Specific birth abnormalities include harelip, cleft palate, den defects for de spine insyd.[47]

According to Lester W. Sontag of De Fels Research Institute (as dem present am for de same EPA study insyd): "Der dey ample evidence dat environment get a role for shaping de physique, behavior, den function of animals insyd, wey dey include man, from conception den no merely from birth. De fetus be capable of perceiving sounds den dey respond to dem by motor activity den cardiac rate change." De effects of noise exposure be highest wen e dey occur between 15 den 60 days after conception, a period for wey dem form major internal organs den de central nervous system.[47]

Later developmental effects dey occur as vasoconstriction for de mother insyd dey reduce blood flow den therefore oxygen den nutrition to de fetus. Dem sanso associate low birth weights den noise plus lower levels of certain hormones for de mother insyd. Dem think dem hormones dey affect fetal growth den to be good indicators of protein production. De difference between de hormone levels of pregnant mothers for noisy versus quiet areas insyd increase as birth approach.[47]

For a 2000 publication insyd, a review of studies for birthweight den noise exposure top dey note dat while sam older studies dey suggest dat wen dem expose women to >65 dB aircraft noise, a small decrease for birthweight insyd dey occur, for a more recent study of 200 Taiwanese women insyd dey include noise dosimetry measurements of individual noise exposure, de authors find no significant association between noise exposure den birth weight after dem adjust give relevant confounders, e.g. social class, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, etc.[5]

Cognitive development

[edit | edit source]

Wen dem regularly expose young kiddies to levels of noise dat dey interfere plus speech, dem go fi develop speech anaa reading difficulties sekof e compromise auditory processing functions. Kiddies dey continue to develop demma speech perception abilities until dem reach demma teens. Dem already show evidence dat wen kiddies learn for noisier classrooms insyd, dem get more difficulty understanding speech dan dem kiddies wey learn for quieter settings insyd.[48]

For a study insyd wey Cornell University conduct am for 1993 insyd, kiddies wey dem expose to noise for learning environments insyd experience trouble plus word discrimination, as well as various cognitive developmental delays.[49][50] For particular insyd, dem commonly associate de writing learning impairment dysgraphia plus environmental stressors for de classroom insyd.[51]

Dem sanso already know high noise levels to damage de physical health of small kiddies. Kiddies from noisy residences often get a significantly higher heart rate (by 2 beats/min for average top) dan dat of kiddies from quieter homes.[52]

Prevention

[edit | edit source]

A hearing protection device (HPD) be an ear protection device wey dem wear am for anaa ova de ears insyd while dem expose am to hazardous noise to help prevent noise-induced hearing loss. HPDs sanso fi protect against oda effects of noise exposure wey dey include tinnitus den hyperacusis. Proper hygiene den care of HPDs fi reduce chances of outer ear infections.[53] Der dey many different types of HPDs available give use, wey dey include earmuffs, earplugs, electronic hearing protection devices, den semi-insert devices.[54] One fi measure de personal attenuation rating thru a hearing protection fit-testing system.

Dem design earmuff-style hearing protection devices to fit ova de outer ear, anaa pinna. Earmuff HPDs typically dey consist of two ear cups den a headband.[54] Dem design earplug style hearing protection devices to fit for de ear canal insyd. Earplugs dey cam for a variety of different subtypes insyd.[54] Sam HPDs dey reduce de sound wey dey reach de eardrum thru a combination of electronic den structural components. Electronic HPDs dey available for both earmuff den custom earplug styles insyd. Electronic microphones, circuitry, den receivers dey perform active noise reduction, wey dem sanso know am as noise-cancelling, for wey dem present a signal dat dey 180-degrees out-of-phase of de noise, wey for theory insyd dey cancel de noise.[54] Canal caps dey similar to earplugs for dat insyd dem dey consist of a soft tip wey dem insert am into de opening of de ear canal.[54]

OSHA dey require de use of hearing protection. But de HPD (without individual selection, training den fit testing) no dey significantly reduce de risk of hearing loss.[55] For example, one study cover more dan 19 thousand workers, sam of wey usually use hearing protective devices, den some no dey use am at all. Der dey no statistically significant difference for de risk of noise-induced hearing loss insyd.[56]

Regulations

[edit | edit source]

Environmental noise regulations dey usually specify a maximum outdoor noise level of 60 to 65 dB(A), while occupational safety organizations dey recommend dat de maximum exposure to noise be 40 hours per week at 85 to 90 dB(A). Give every additional 3 dB(A), dem reduce de maximum exposure time by a factor of 2, e.g. 20 hours per week at 88 dB(A). Sometimes, dem use a factor of two per additional 5 dB(A); howeva, de health literature acknowledge dem occupational regulations as inadequate to protect against hearing loss den oda health effects. For an effort to prevent noise-induced hearing loss insyd, dem already create many programs den initiative, like de Buy Quiet program, wey dey encourage employers to purchase quieter tools den equipment, den de Safe-In-Sound Award, wey dey recognize organizations plus successful hearing loss prevention strategies.[57][58]

Plus regard to indoor noise pollution for residences insyd, de U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) no set any restrictions for limits to de level of noise top. Rada, e already provide a list of recommended levels for ein Model Community Noise Control Ordinance insyd, wey dem publish am for 1975 insyd. For instance, de recommended noise level give indoor residences dey less dan anaa equal to 45 dB.[59][60]

De federal government no fund noise pollution control for residences insyd for part insyd sekof de disagreements for establishing causal links insyd between sounds den health risks, since de effect of noise often dey psychological den sanso sekof e dey leave no singular tangible trace of damage for de human body top. For instance, dem fi attribute hearing loss to a variety of factors wey dey include age, rada dan solely sekof excessive exposure to noise.[61][62] A state anaa local government fi regulate indoor residential noise, howeva, such as wen excessive noise from within a home dey cause disturbances to nearby residences.[61][63]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. Baumgaertner, Emily; Kao, Jason; Lutz, Eleanor; Sedgwick, Josephine; et al. (June 9, 2023). "Noise Could Take Years Off Your Life Here's How". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Münzel, Thomas; Kröller-Schön, Swenja; Oelze, Matthias; Gori, Tommaso; Schmidt, Frank P.; Steven, Sebastian; Hahad, Omar; Röösli, Martin; Wunderli, Jean-Marc; Daiber, Andreas; Sørensen, Mette (2020). "Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Traffic Noise with a Focus on Nighttime Noise and the New WHO Noise Guidelines". Annual Review of Public Health. 41: 309–328. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-081519-062400. PMID 31922930.
  3. 1 2 Münzel T, Schmidt FP, Steven S, Herzog J, Daiber A, Sørensen M (February 2018). "Environmental Noise and the Cardiovascular System". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 71 (6): 688–697. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.015. PMID 29420965.
  4. 1 2 Kerns, Ellen; Masterson, Elizabeth A.; Themann, Christa L.; Calvert, Geoffrey M. (2018). "Cardiovascular conditions, hearing difficulty, and occupational noise exposure within US industries and occupations". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 61 (6): 477–491. doi:10.1002/ajim.22833. PMC 6897488. PMID 29537072.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Passchier-Vermeer W, Passchier WF (March 2000). "Noise exposure and public health". Environmental Health Perspectives. 108 (Suppl 1): 123–31. doi:10.1289/ehp.00108s1123. JSTOR 3454637. PMC 1637786. PMID 10698728.
  6. Rosenhall U, Pedersen K, Svanborg A (August 1990). "Presbycusis and noise-induced hearing loss". Ear and Hearing. 11 (4): 257–63. doi:10.1097/00003446-199008000-00002. PMID 2210099.
  7. Schmid RE (2007-02-18). "Aging nation faces growing hearing loss". CBS News. Archived from the original on 2007-11-15. Retrieved 2007-02-18.
  8. Senate Public Works Committee, Noise Pollution and Abatement Act of 1972, S. Rep. No. 1160, 92nd Cong. 2nd session
  9. "Noise: Health Effects and Controls" (PDF). University of California, Berkeley. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-25. Retrieved 2007-12-22.
  10. Kryter KD (1994). The handbook of hearing and the effects of noise: physiology, psychology, and public health. Boston: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-427455-6.
  11. "10. Noise" (PDF). Natural Resources and the Environment 2006. 2006. pp. 188–189. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 14, 2011.
  12. Li, Ang; Martino, Erika; Mansour, Adelle; Bentley, Rebecca (2022). "Environmental Noise Exposure and Mental Health: Evidence From a Population-Based Longitudinal Study". American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 63 (2): e39–e48. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.02.020. PMID 35466022. S2CID 248361177.
  13. "Noise in Europe 2014". European Environment Agency.
  14. Godwin R (3 July 2018). "Sonic doom: how noise pollution kills thousands each year". The Guardian via www.theguardian.com.
  15. Katz J, Chasin M, English KM, Hood LJ, Tillery KL (2014-09-19). Handbook of clinical audiology (Seventh ed.). Philadelphia. ISBN 978-1-4511-9163-9. OCLC 877024342.
  16. "Causes". American Tinnitus Association. 2015-03-02. Retrieved 2019-02-22.
  17. Waldvogel D, Mattle HP, Sturzenegger M, Schroth G (March 1998). "Pulsatile tinnitus--a review of 84 patients" (PDF). Journal of Neurology. 245 (3): 137–42. doi:10.1007/s004150050193. PMID 9553842. S2CID 10767191.
  18. Nicolas-Puel C, Faulconbridge RL, Guitton M, Puel JL, Mondain M, Uziel A (2002). "Characteristics of tinnitus and etiology of associated hearing loss: a study of 123 patients". The International Tinnitus Journal. 8 (1): 37–44. PMID 14763234.
  19. Ising H, Babisch W, Kruppa B (1999). "Noise-Induced Endocrine Effects and Cardiovascular Risk". Noise & Health. 1 (4): 37–48. PMID 12689488.
  20. Davies H, Kamp IV (2012-11-01). "Noise and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature 2008-2011". Noise & Health. 14 (61): 287–91. doi:10.4103/1463-1741.104895. PMID 23257579.
  21. Lin FR, Metter EJ, O'Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L (February 2011). "Hearing loss and incident dementia". Archives of Neurology. 68 (2): 214–20. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.362. PMC 3277836. PMID 21320988.
  22. Maschke C (2003). "Stress Hormone Changes in Persons exposed to Simulated Night Noise". Noise & Health. 5 (17): 35–45. PMID 12537833.
  23. Franssen EA, van Wiechen CM, Nagelkerke NJ, Lebret E (May 2004). "Aircraft noise around a large international airport and its impact on general health and medication use". Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 61 (5): 405–13. doi:10.1136/oem.2002.005488. PMC 1740783. PMID 15090660.
  24. Lercher P, Hörtnagl J, Kofler WW (1993). "Work noise annoyance and blood pressure: combined effects with stressful working conditions". International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 65 (1): 23–8. doi:10.1007/BF00586054. PMID 8354571. S2CID 41612151.
  25. 1 2 Lee PJ, Park SH, Jeong JH, Choung T, Kim KY (November 2019). "Association between transportation noise and blood pressure in adults living in multi-storey residential buildings". Environment International. 132 105101. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105101. PMID 31434052.
  26. Dzhambov A, Tilov B, Markevych I, Dimitrova D (December 2017). "Residential road traffic noise and general mental health in youth: The role of noise annoyance, neighborhood restorative quality, physical activity, and social cohesion as potential mediators". Environment International. 109: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.09.009. PMID 28917129.
  27. Klompmaker JO, Janssen NA, Bloemsma LD, Gehring U, Wijga AH, van den Brink C, et al. (August 2019). "Associations of Combined Exposures to Surrounding Green, Air Pollution, and Road Traffic Noise with Cardiometabolic Diseases". Environmental Health Perspectives. 127 (8): 87003. doi:10.1289/EHP3857. PMC 6792364. PMID 31393793.
  28. Chang TY, Liu CS, Huang KH, Chen RY, Lai JS, Bao BY (April 2011). "High-frequency hearing loss, occupational noise exposure and hypertension: a cross-sectional study in male workers". Environmental Health. 10: 35. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-10-35. PMC 3090324. PMID 21518430.
  29. Chang TY, Su TC, Lin SY, Jain RM, Chan CC (November 2007). "Effects of occupational noise exposure on 24-hour ambulatory vascular properties in male workers". Environmental Health Perspectives. 115 (11): 1660–4. doi:10.1289/ehp.10346. PMC 2072860. PMID 18008000.
  30. 1 2 Teixeira, Liliane R.; Pega, Frank; Dzhambov, Angel M.; Bortkiewicz, Alicja; da Silva, Denise T. Correa; de Andrade, Carlos A.F.; Gadzicka, Elzbieta; Hadkhale, Kishor; Iavicoli, Sergio; Martínez-Silveira, Martha S.; Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska, Małgorzata (2021). "The effect of occupational exposure to noise on ischaemic heart disease, stroke and hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-Related Burden of Disease and Injury". Environment International. 154 106387. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106387. PMC 8204276. PMID 33612311.
  31. Basner, M., Babisch, W., Davis, A., Brink, M., Clark, C., THE LANCET, Volume 383, issue 9925(April, 2014), page 1325-1332.
  32. "Children and Noise" (PDF). World Health Organization.
  33. Elizondo-Garza FJ (1999). "Noise problems, savage approaches. From just forget it, to physical violence". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 105 (2): 942. Bibcode:1999ASAJ..105..942E. doi:10.1121/1.425711.
  34. Schmuziger N, Patscheke J, Stieglitz R, Probst R (January 2012). "Is there addiction to loud music? Findings in a group of non-professional pop/rock musicians". Audiology Research. 2 (1): 57–63. doi:10.4081/audiores.2012.e11. PMC 4630946. PMID 26557326. Archived from the original on 2017-11-10. Retrieved 2017-11-10.
  35. "Silently Suffering From Hearing Loss Negatively Affects Quality of Life". American Psychological Association. Retrieved 2018-03-01.
  36. Hammer MS, Swinburn TK, Neitzel RL (February 2014). "Environmental noise pollution in the United States: developing an effective public health response". Environmental Health Perspectives. 122 (2): 115–9. doi:10.1289/ehp.1307272. PMC 3915267. PMID 24311120.
  37. Glad KA, Hafstad GS, Jensen TK, Dyb G (August 2017). "A longitudinal study of psychological distress and exposure to trauma reminders after terrorism". Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 9 (Suppl 1): 145–152. doi:10.1037/tra0000224. PMID 27831737. S2CID 24474520.
  38. 1 2 3 Clout, Laura (9 April 2009). "How Noisy Neighbours Millions of Lives". Daily Express. Retrieved 4 March 2021.
  39. "London is home to the noisiest neighbours". The Evening Standard.
  40. Miedema and Oudshoorn 2001 cited in "Hypertension and exposure to noise near airports". Medscape.
  41. Miedema HM, Vos H (1999). "Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 105 (6): 3336–44. Bibcode:1999ASAJ..105.3336M. doi:10.1121/1.424662.
  42. Gelfand SA (2001). Essentials of Audiology. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers. ISBN 978-1-58890-017-3.
  43. Walker JR, Fahy F (1998). Fundamentals of noise and vibration. London: E & FN Spon. ISBN 978-0-419-22700-7.
  44. 1 2 Field JM (1993). "Effect of personal and situational variables upon noise annoyance in residential areas". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 93 (5): 2753–63. Bibcode:1993ASAJ...93.2753F. doi:10.1121/1.405851.
  45. Halpern D (1995). Mental health and the built environment: more than bricks and mortar?. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-7484-0235-9.
  46. Stellman JM (1998). Encyclopedia of occupational health and safety. International Labour Organization. ISBN 978-92-2-109203-2.
  47. 1 2 3 Noise: A Health Problem United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control, Washington, D.C. 20460, August, 1978
  48. Nelson PB (1959). "Sound in the Classroom". ASHRAE Journal. 45 (2): 22–25.
  49. Evans GW, Lepore SJ (1993). "Nonauditory Effects of Noise on Children: A Critical Review". Children's Environments. 10 (1): 31–51. JSTOR 41515250.
  50. Wakefield J (June 2002). "Learning the hard way: the poor environment of America's schools". Environmental Health Perspectives. 110 (6): A298-305. doi:10.1289/ehp.110-a298. PMC 1240882. PMID 12055059.
  51. "Dysgraphiastaff". Brain.HE. Retrieved 2017-09-09.
  52. Belojevic G, Jakovljevic B, Stojanov V, Paunovic K, Ilic J (February 2008). "Urban road-traffic noise and blood pressure and heart rate in preschool children". Environment International. 34 (2): 226–31. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2007.08.003. PMID 17869340.
  53. Ntlhakana L, Kanji A and Khoza-Shangase K. (2015). "The use of hearing protection devices in South Africa: exploring the current status in a gold and a non-ferrous mine". Occupational Health Southern Africa: 10–15.
  54. 1 2 3 4 5 Rawool VW (2011). "Chapter 6: Hearing Protection and Enhancement Devices". Hearing Conservation: In Occupational, Recreational, Educational, and Home Settings. Thieme. pp. 136–173. ISBN 978-1-60406-257-1.
  55. Berger, Elliott H.; Voix, Jérémie (2018). "Chapter 11: Hearing Protection Devices". In D.K. Meinke; E.H. Berger; R. Neitzel; D.P. Driscoll; K. Bright (eds.). The Noise Manual (6th ed.). Falls Church, Virginia: American Industrial Hygiene Association. pp. 255–308. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
  56. Groenewold M.R.; Masterson E.A.; Themann C.L.; Davis R.R. (2014). "Do hearing protectors protect hearing?". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 57 (9). Wiley Periodicals: 1001–1010. doi:10.1002/ajim.22323. ISSN 1097-0274. PMC 4671486. PMID 24700499. Retrieved 15 October 2022.
  57. "CDC - Buy Quiet - NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topics". cdc.gov. 2019-01-10.
  58. "Safe-in-Sound: Excellence in Hearing Loss Prevention Award". Safe-in-Sound. Retrieved July 12, 2016.
  59. Williams LK, Langley RL (2000). Environmental Health Secrets. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 978-1-56053-408-2.
  60. "EPA Identifies Noise Levels Affecting Health and Welfare". April 2, 1972. Archived from the original on January 27, 2001.
  61. 1 2 Schmidt CW (January 2005). "Noise that annoys: regulating unwanted sound". Environmental Health Perspectives. 113 (1): A42-5. doi:10.1289/ehp.113-a42. PMC 1253730. PMID 15631959.
  62. Staples SL (February 1996). "Human response to environmental noise. Psychological research and public policy". The American Psychologist. 51 (2): 143–50. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.143. PMID 8746149.
  63. Leighton P (April 14, 2009). "Beverly considers rules to quiet loud parties". The Salem News.
[edit | edit source]